Monday, December 9, 2019
Origin That Means To Preach Or Preaching â⬠Myassignmenthelp.Com
Question: Discuss About The Origin That Means To Preach Or Preaching? Answer: Introducation The relation between Christian identity and kerygma is identified in this study using two important documents in the study of Christianity. The view of Charles Cousar and Gerhard Ebeling is presented in the study to carry out the argument on Christian identity and the influence of kerygma and the reliability. Different approaches taken by the author to demonstrate the idea are analyzed and compared in the study. The word kerygma is of Greek origin that means to preach or the preaching of the gospels. Hence, it is not an interpretation of a text but an interpretation itself preached by a person. From the interpretation, Cousar (2006) opined that that gods message is not the Bible, but Jesus Christ himself. According to this work of Ebling (1963) on the other hand, the belief of god is blended into the old aged society. The way of life in the previous society was inseparable from god. The order and the experience of the world were blended deeply with the identity of Christ. So these texts are the first level of interpretation by the primary observers. Cousar (2006) positions the present time human races as the hearers and interpreters. Hence, the work forms a hermeneutical arc and divided in several levels. Hermeneutical study does not propose one to interpret the meaning of the authors intention, but to consider the appropriateness and application of the text. The first level readings are als o nothing but a hunch. The second level describes the struggle of the writers where they found themselves in a gap where the aim is not to interpret the feelings, perception not even the situation of the history, but the text itself. It is all about finding the dynamic thoughts. However, Ebling (1963) stated that the Christian way of thinking and idea of god according to it was the sole dominator of that period. It is because the society considered the Christian talk of God was the ultimate law and the society was bound by it. The faith and the words were inseparable until the introduction of the secularization that restricted man to atheism by the legitimate and methodological approach. The Christian kerygma was so deeply embedded in the society that it became indistinguishable and confusing and ultimately got tangled. The kerygma of the Christian priests was challenged by men. The faith was misjudged with the limitation of human capability. According to the secularized modern thin kers, everything in the world can be calculated and hence controlled with proper planning. Hence, Coursar (1963) concluded that the testimony is not limited to one solution or a one interpretation but is a dynamic with multiple meaning. The act of crucify itself describes it a beginning of a fresh perspective from the old one. Hence, various statements are present that helps one to go back in time over and over again for the fresh imaginative perspective. Ebling (1963) identified the former age or the Christianized era was challenged as a whole. A need of protection of the former age then became necessary and the process led to make false probation. The faith was confused in the fear of extinction that set up the limitations of men that were eventually stepped down by the unbelievers who themselves had no clear understanding of itself. The discussion can be concluded with the idea of kerygma and the Christian identity. Kerygma has its influence in presenting Christianity to humanity. Both the authors pointed different aspects of the problem. Ebeling showed the misconception of Christianity due to the improper understanding of its actuality by the gospels. It is due to the inseparable entrenched condition. On the other hand, Cousar highlighted hermeneutical approach of interpretation of both old and new testaments and states that it itself is an interpretation of Christ. It is also dynamic and a description of its appropriateness than can never have a singular conclusion and always put one to the primary interpretation. References Cousar, C.B., 2006.An Introduction to the New Testament: Witnesses to God's New Work. Presbyterian Publishing Corp. Ebeling, Gerhard, 1963. Words and Faith, trans. JamesW. Leitch. Philadelphia; Fortress.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.